|
June 2003
Beyond Hope
By Michael J. Katin, MD
|
Hope is a pathological belief in the occcurence of the impossible.
H. L. Mencken
But groundless hope, like unconditional love, is the only
kind worth having. John Perry Barlow
It is always frustrating that there can be a wide range of responses to
cancer treatment, and the many intangibles may include the motivation and
attitude of the individual patient. Attempts have been made to quantitate
characteristics such as optimism and correlate these to outcome but most
of these studies have failed to show a relationship. Perhaps this is due
to the lack of a way to truly assess an individual's personality or whether
it would be actually more pertinent to study the caregivers, who need to
make sure the patient goes through with evaluation and treatment. It's improbable
that a person will travel and go through a lot of time and expense seeking
investigational treatment, for example, when his or her family is already
deciding how to split up the china settings.
Regardless, we have all seen examples of people who are able to hold it
together until a specific date or event has occurred, such as an anniversary,
a holiday, or the conclusion of American Idol II. It has been observed that
more deaths occur on or immediately after a person's birthday than before
it (the death-dip
phenomenon). Amazingly, this applies to natural deaths and accidents,
and is not related to suicides (even in people who are dealing with the
realization that they have just turned 40).
Since it may not be possible to accurately stratify
people by personality characteristics, the next best
thing might be to try to quantitate the amount of
extrinsic support sought by the patient. This might be
a challenge as well. There could be an attempt to
correlate CR, PR, and ORR with specific religions, but
positive findings could produce severe cultural
repercussions (p <0.001 for Lutheran Church-Missouri
Synod compared to Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran
Synod). Patient advocacy groups are numerous and can be
the source of shared experiences and information to
help patients better cope with effects of diseases and
treatments. There are literally hundreds of these
groups, but participation of a patient in a large
number of different groups might actually reflect
confusion and discouragement.
Determination might also be made of the number of hours on the internet
seeking information to fight the disease. Unfortunately, the novice internet
surfer might be discouraged after looking up www.help.com and finding only
information on how to "Snap Out of Your Windows XP Nightmare." Once that
person has mastered the ability to follow through links ad infinitum, he
or she may no longer have time to leave the house to keep medical appointments
or even buy food, and this could have a negative impact on survival. This
could be remedied by seeking help on one
last site.
Ultimately any type of concrete assessment of
hopefulness or helplessness will probably be impossible
and any of these attempts may only serve to put the
onus on the patient for not "trying." If our
therapeutic efforts were adequately effective, it
wouldn't make a difference. We can all hope that will
eventually be the case.
Note: This is the first time a reference has been
made, even though not explicit, to a person's birth
centennial--certainly the most prominent person to have
this happen in a long time. The question was asked as
to why the 100th birthday of George Burns wasn't
similarly honored. Two reasons: 1. this column
started one year after that event, and 2. in radiation
oncology we would much rather be associated with Hope
than Burns.
email: mkatin@radiotherapy.com